Environmental Ethics: Assessing Scale- Analysis of Morgan-Knapp and Goodman
‘There is no more neutrality in the world. You either have to be part of the solution, or you're going to be part of the problem.’- Eldridge Cleaver In ‘Consequentialism, Climate Harm and Individual Obligations’, Christopher Morgan-Knapp and Charles Goodman critique the argument that abiding by act-consequentialism assumes that individual emissions don’t matter because they are too minuscule. Building off their arguments, I am going to analyze the relevance of their theories and examples with the lens that climate changes disproportionally affects poorer, indigenous, and marginalized communities and conclude with a test that suggests the optimum size of an industry is based on the relationship between its emissions and the number of people dependent on it and what an environmentally oriented government should do. Morgan-Knapp and Goodman start by stating the commonly held view that act-consequentialism cannot provide any moral reason for individuals to voluntarily reduce the...